Pac Rim 2024
Reviewer Matrix
The following Reviewer Matrix details the criteria the Pac Rim Strand Chairs and Reviewers will be assessing proposals on. Please consider all of the criteria on this matrix prior to submitting your proposal.
Reviewer Matrix
Relevant and Clear
The proposal clearly aligns and is relevant to the conference strand & topic descriptions and theme.
1 – Yes
0 – No
Cultural Competent and Disability Aligned
The proposal abstract is well written, culturally competent (respects other cultures), and aligned with current disability issues.
1 – Yes
0 – No
Learning Objectives
The learning objectives provided and specify what the audience will learn and/or gain from the presentation.
1 – Yes
0 – No
Presentation Type
The proposal is thoughtful, intentional, and appropriate for the presentation type (i.e., live presentation, recorded presentation, poster presentation).
1 – Yes
0 – No
Target Audience
The proposal highlights best practices, new developments, innovative techniques, or effective methods that can be implemented and be useful to the target audience.
1 – Yes
0 – No
Final Reviewer Decisions and Comments
Please select your final decision and provide applicable comments:
For Accepts – Write at least a sentence on why you think this proposal should be accepted.
For Declines – Write at least a sentence on why you think this proposal should not be accepted and what is needed to fully meet the criteria.
Accept – The proposal is a good contribution to the conference and strand/topic areas
Decline – As is, the proposal is not a good fit for the conference and topic strands.